Battle of the AIs #1 MidJourney vs Flux 1.1 Pro: AI Image Generator

Today's AI image generator prompt is:

photography, portrait of contrast, profile silhouette of a woman, vibrant hot pink backdrop, visualize using a camera setup that mimics a large aperture, focusing solely on the silhouette's edge, while a low ISO maintains the richness of color without grain, photorealistic, UHD

MidJourney v6 vs Flux 1.1 Pro

So, which one did you like best? Well, first of all, at Tess AI we've created an image evaluation agent - it can correlate the result with the prompt, indicating a final score for the AI-generating model. If you want to get to know it, here's the link!

Winning Model Name

Midjourney v6

Score for each model

  • Midjourney v6:
  • Prompt adherence: 90/100
  • Overall Design Quality: 92/100
  • Flux 1.1 Pro:
  • Prompt adherence: 90/100
  • Overall Design Quality: 88/100

Overall Challenge Score

  • Midjourney v6: 182/200
  • Flux 1.1 Pro: 178/200

Model Performance Summary

Midjourney v6:
Midjourney v6 showed a strong adherence to the prompt, capturing most of the key elements requested. The woman's profile silhouette was well centered and the vibrant pink background stood out in the composition. The simulation of a large aperture was well executed, focusing on the edge of the silhouette, although the face still showed some detail. The colors were rich and without noticeable graininess, maintaining the desired photorealistic aesthetic. The overall quality of the design was rated 92/100, standing out for its strong aesthetic, balanced composition and effective use of color and lighting. Recommendations included increasing the blur on the face and refining anatomical details such as the ear and hand.

Flux 1.1 Pro:
The Flux 1.1 Pro also demonstrated a good grip on the prompt, capturing the silhouette in profile and the vibrant pink background. The imitation of a large aperture was present, but the focus on the edge of the silhouette could have been more precise. The image displayed rich, saturated colors without grain, which was expected. The overall design quality was rated 88/100, with a visually appealing aesthetic and a simple but effective composition. Recommendations for Flux included refining the focus on the edge of the silhouette and softening the blur for a smoother transition between subject and background.

Statistics and comparisons

  • Both models received the same score for adherence to the prompt (90/100), indicating that they both captured the main elements requested well.
  • The Midjourney v6 outperformed the Flux 1.1 Pro in overall design quality, with a score of 92/100 against 88/100, excelling in aesthetics, composition and use of color.
  • Midjourney v6 had a slightly superior technical execution, with recommendations focusing on minor adjustments, while Flux 1.1 Pro had suggestions more aimed at improving focus and blur.

In conclusion, both models demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating images based on complex prompts, but the Midjourney v6 stood out slightly in terms of overall design quality and technical execution.

What did you think? Which one won this challenge in your opinion? Let us know in the comments!

Rica Barros
Rica Barros
CEO of Pareto

Related articles