Today's AI image generator prompt is:
a woman covered in purple paint, in the style of dark white and dark red, organic material, layered acrylic washes, alex grey, foampunk, body extensions, silver and crimson
Flux 1.1 Pro vs Google Imagen 3
So, which one did you like best? Well, first of all, at Tess AI we've created an image evaluation agent - it can correlate the result with the prompt, indicating a final score for the AI-generating model. If you want to get to know it, here's the link!
Winning Model Name:
Google Image 3
Score for each model:
- Flux 1.1 Pro: 43/100 (Difficulty Points) + 65/100 (Overall Design Quality) = 108/200
- Google Imagen 3: Average 7/10 (Difficulty Points) + 80/100 (Overall Design Quality) = 150/200
Overall Challenge Score:
- Google Imagen 3: 150/200
- Flux 1.1 Pro: 108/200
Summary of the Performance of the Two Models:
Flux 1.1 Pro
The Flux 1.1 Pro model presented an image with high resolution and sharpness, excelling in skin definition and paint detail. However, adherence to the prompt was limited, with a score of 75/100. The image failed to incorporate key elements such as the colors "dark white" and "dark red", as well as lacking influences from Alex Grey, foampunk, or organic materials and body extensions.
In the difficulty points, Flux 1.1 Pro got a total score of 43/100. It excelled in high definition (9/10) and skin texture (8/10), but failed to incorporate foampunk elements, organic materials or body extensions, each receiving 0/10. The color palette was limited, with a score of 4/10, and the similarity to Alex Grey's style was almost non-existent (2/10).
The overall quality of the design was rated at 65/100. The aesthetics and composition were well executed, but the restricted color palette and lack of specific elements detracted from the rating. Recommendations include adjusting the prompt to be more specific and exploring AI models that better handle complex artistic styles.
Google Image 3
Google Imagen 3 demonstrated the most effective prompt adherence, with a score of 85/100. The image captured most of the elements requested, including the presence of purple paint, Alex Grey influences and foampunk elements. The color palette incorporated silver and dark red tones, and there was a hint of body extensions.
On the difficulty points, the model scored an average of 7/10. The high definition was well judged (9/10), and the body painting was convincing (8/10). Elements of Alex Grey and foampunk were noticeable, but could have been more elaborate. The color palette and the presence of organic materials were subtle, with scores of 6/10 and 5/10 respectively.
The overall quality of the design was 80/100. The image was visually interesting, with good lighting and composition. The color palette could be bolder, and recommendations include exploring the contrast between dark white and dark red more, as well as integrating foampunk elements and body extensions more prominently.
Conclusion:
Google Imagen 3 outperformed Flux 1.1 Pro in terms of prompt adherence and overall design quality. Although both models have areas for improvement, Google Imagen 3 demonstrated a more complete understanding of the prompt and a more satisfying visual execution.
What did you think? Which one won this challenge in your opinion? Let us know in the comments!